How Genetic Material is Changing Consanguinity

The rapidly advancing field of reproductive technology presents trust and estate professionals with uncharted territory in estate planning. When genetic material, such as frozen eggs, sperm, and embryos, is left behind by a decedent, it raises questions of ownership, heirship, and the boundaries of consanguinity—a concept long central to establishing inheritance lines.

The traditional hierarchy of consanguinity determines who an estate’s lawful heirs are when a person dies intestate. However, as reproductive technology enables children to be conceived posthumously, the straightforward lines of consanguinity can blur, complicating how your clients’ assets could be distributed.

Understanding Consanguinity in Modern Heirship

Consanguinity historically defines lawful heirs based on biological family ties to a common ancestor. At HeirSearch, we categorize consanguinity by levels, such as Lineal, Level 1, Level 2, and beyond. Lineal, for example, includes children, grandchildren, and so on. Level 1 includes immediate family members, such as parents, siblings, nieces, and nephews. Level 2 broadens to grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins, and so the levels continue. In cases of intestacy, each level must be exhausted of living heirs before moving to the next. When there are no surviving children or spouses, this hierarchy becomes critical to establishing who will inherit the decedent’s assets.

Our understanding of consanguinity is occasionally updated to reflect the needs of our world. Until recently, it was limited to blood relatives. However, most states have revised these definitions to include adopted children, and some now treat “half-blood” relatives on equal footing with “full-blood” relations. With advancements in reproductive technology, establishing heirship can become more complex. For example, where do posthumously conceived children fit in? When a child is conceived after the death of a parent through frozen genetic material, professionals must navigate new questions about family lineage, inheritance rights, and whether such children qualify as lawful heirs.

Gametes, Embryos, and Estate Planning Challenges

In general, courts view gametes—unfertilized eggs and sperm—as personal property, allowing individuals to dictate their future use through contracts or wills. For example, a woman may specify in her estate plan that her frozen eggs be destroyed, preserved, or left to a surviving spouse. Without a will, many states default to awarding control of such genetic material to the surviving spouse.

Embryos, however, present a unique legal challenge. State laws vary significantly in defining embryos and their disposition. For example, Florida law requires couples to establish a written agreement for handling embryos in the event of divorce, death, or other unforeseen circumstances. Without this type of contract, control typically falls to the person who contributed the genetic material. In contrast, Louisiana views fertilized embryos as legal persons rather than property, subjecting them to the “best interest of the fertilized ovum” standard. This means that embryos cannot be destroyed, as doing so would be akin to ending a life. Such laws raise complex questions in estate planning, where the presence of frozen embryos can affect asset division and future heirship.

The Heirship Implications of Posthumously Conceived Children

Another critical consideration for estate professionals is the status of posthumously conceived children—those born using genetic material from a deceased parent. Historically, most states allowed children born within ten months of a parent’s death to inherit, as this timeline aligns with typical gestation. However, reproductive technology has pushed this boundary, making it possible to conceive children many years after a parent’s passing.

Currently, inheritance laws vary widely. Some states allow posthumously conceived children to inherit if the deceased parent explicitly consented to posthumous conception and parenthood. Others impose time limits on how long after a death a child must be conceived to inherit. In a landmark 2012 case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that posthumously conceived children could receive Social Security benefits if they would inherit under state intestacy laws, effectively leaving the decision up to individual states.

This patchwork of regulations underscores the need for estate planning that anticipates potential scenarios involving posthumously conceived heirs. Without a clear plan, families may face legal battles to establish a child’s right to inherit, creating emotional and financial strain.

Protecting Clients with Comprehensive Estate Plans

Given the complexity surrounding genetic material in estate planning, professionals must help clients outline their intentions. Whether they wish to pass on frozen embryos or prevent posthumous conception, clients benefit from having clear documentation to avoid leaving these critical decisions to the courts. Here are a few practical tips for trust and estate professionals:

Address Ownership and Disposition

If clients have frozen gametes or embryos, document their wishes. Specify whether these materials should be destroyed, passed to a surviving partner, or donated if the client passes away. For example, individuals can stipulate that frozen eggs be preserved for potential future children or that embryos be donated to others facing infertility. Advising your clients to include these details in their estate plans helps avoid confusion and ensures the client’s wishes are honored.

Account for State-Specific Laws

Since laws vary widely between states, clients need to understand how their state views embryos and gametes (personal property vs. legal person). You should encourage your clients to review their estate plans annually to ensure compliance with local laws, especially if they move states or store genetic material in another jurisdiction.

Define Heirship Rights for Posthumously Conceived Children

Clients wishing for posthumously conceived children to inherit, should specify this in their estate plans. Clients may also want to indicate whether such children should inherit equally with children born during their lifetime. Proactively addressing these issues reduces ambiguity and ensures all intended heirs are recognized.

Work with Reproductive Attorneys and Specialists

As an Estate professional, consider partnering with attorneys specializing in reproductive technology to stay updated on relevant laws and best practices. This collaboration ensures that estate plans align with the latest legal standards and protect your clients’ wishes.

Estate Planning Will Never Be Obsolete

With careful planning, trust and estate professionals can guide clients through the evolving legal landscape of reproductive technology, helping them safeguard their legacy and protect future generations. While technology may be changing the definition of family, establishing accurate and thorough wills and estate plans remains the key to preserving the intention, security, and continuity of inheritance for all family members.

For legal professionals who need to establish heirship for probate purposes, HeirSearch offers unparalleled service and commitment, with a 97% success rate.

Contact us to learn more about our process and how we can support your needs.

Phone: +1 (800)-663-2255

This report is for informational purposes only and is intended only as a reference. HeirSearch does not endorse or recommend any of the products or services offered in the third-party articles or content contained within. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or effectiveness of the same and will not assume any liability related to the same. Additionally, nothing contained herein may be construed as legal advice. All offers are void where prohibited by law. Copyright © International Genealogical Search Inc. All rights reserved.